In Defense of the Intel Judgment

Intel

The judgment by the General Court, on 12 June 2104, in the Case T-286/09 Intel (ECLI:EU:T:2014:547) has been one of the most controversial in recent years. It it part of the ongoing debate in EU competition law between those who seek to introduce a ‘more economic’ approach to Art 102 TFEU and break away from the formalism they perceive in the Court’s jurisprudence, and those who see the Court’s existing case law as well grounded and effective, and see the more to a ‘more economic’ approach as being a move towards unnecessary uncertainty.

I personally can see why in many cases the law should have a clear position on what its ‘theory of harm’ is in relation t particular abuses, but I have always been nervous of the demand that an Art 102 TFEU infringement should only be proven when the Commission can show that a particular level of actual harm has been proved. I take the view that it should be possible to take a position, before behaviour takes place, on whether it is likely to lawful or not; one should not have to wait and see what actually happens before lawfulness can be established. But rather than hear my views it now possible to read a very insightful and concise Editorial from the Journal of European Competition Law & Practice by Prof Richard Whish, which has been made freely available (thanks to the good folks at Chillin’ Competition for the tip).

http://jeclap.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/11/23/jeclap.lpu108.full

Whish’s view, especially the point about making the law ‘administrable’, very much accords with my on and therefore I’m happy to present his argument without further comment …

 


 

Companion to Rodger & MacCulloch, Competition Law and Policy in the EU & UK, 5th Ed

The discussion of Intel judgment should be read alongside the discussion of Rebates in Chapter 4, pp 113 & 114

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

How to Crack a Nut

Competition Law Issues in the EU, UK & Beyond

EU Law Analysis

Competition Law Issues in the EU, UK & Beyond

Legal Cheek

Legal news & gossip, cheeky commentary and careers advice

Criminal Cartels Blog

law and practice

LancsLaw

The official blog of Lancaster University Law School

Antitrust Today – An Antitrust Law Blog By Constantine Cannon

Competition Law Issues in the EU, UK & Beyond

Kluwer Competition Law Blog

Competition Law Issues in the EU, UK & Beyond

21st Century Competition

Reflections on Modern Antitrust

botzarelli

This, that and the other

Paul Bernal's Blog

Privacy, Human Rights, Law, The Internet, Politics and more

Gamer/Law

Games and technology law explained

eutopialaw

EU Law: Comment and Analysis

Charon QC

UK law blog

Chillin'Competition

Relaxing whilst doing Competition Law is not an Oxymoron

Competition Law Issues in the EU, UK & Beyond

Competition Policy blog

Competition Law and Policy blog by the ESRC Centre for Competition Policy

Head of Legal

legal comment from Carl Gardner

Charon QC's UK Law Tour

A Legal Domesday Book?

%d bloggers like this: